U.S. PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP
PUBLIC CITIZEN SIERRA CLUB
NORTHERN ALASKA ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER

OIL INDUSTRY MONEY
MOVES SENATE ON ARCTIC REFUGE
Arctic Refuge Drilling Supporters
Receive Four Times More than Opponents
This week, the Senate will vote on the federal budget Reconciliation Bill, which contains a provision to allow oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. On the eve of this critical vote to open the Arctic Refuge to oil and gas exploration, drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. On the eve of this critical vote to open the Arctic Refuge to oil and gas exploration, U.S. PIRG, Public Citizen, Sierra Club and the Northern Alaska Environmental Center examined the role played by political action committee contributions from oil and gas interests in a May 1995 Senate vote. This vote, on Senate Concurrent Resolution 13 to the Fiscal 1996 Budget Resolution, was on a motion to table an amendment offered by Senator Roth to prohibit oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (56 voted to table and 44 voted against tabling). The vote was, in effect, a vote to permit drilling. Key findings include:

1.  Senators voting to permit oil and gas exploration on the Arctic
    National Wildlife Refuge received, on average, more than four times
    as much from oil and gas-related PACs as those voting against
    drilling.  Senators voting to permit drilling received an average
    of $77,929 while senators voting to prohibit drilling received $18,356.

2.  Forty-five of the top 50 pro-drilling PAC recipients in the current U.S.
    Senate have voted to open the refuge to oil drilling.

3.  Leading the charge to open the Arctic Refuge to oil drilling by what
    environmentalists consider a "sneak attack" by the budget process are
    Alaska Senators Frank Murkowski and Ted Stevens.  Since 1989, they
    have received $122,835 and $90,425 respectively from oil and gas
    related PACs.  Another long time advocate of drilling, Senator
    Bennett Johnston (D-Louisiana), has received $189,000 since 1989.

4.  Fifty-four PACs with oil and gas interests contributed over $17.5
    million to U.S. Congressional campaigns with over $5 million going
    to current senators between 1989 and June 1995.

TOTAL SENATE CAMPAIGN EXPENDITURES FROM 54 PACS THAT ARE MEMBERS OF THE AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE AND CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT OIL PRODUCERS:
JANUARY 1989-JUNE 1995

RANK    MEMBER                  PARTY   STATE    AMOUNT    ROTH VOTE
   1    Hutchison, Kay Baile     REP     TX     $206,549       -
   2    Johnston, J Bennett      DEM     LA     $189,000       -
   3    Coats, Daniel R          REP     IN     $186,550       -
   4    Gramm, William Philip    REP     TX     $163,550       -
   5    Dewine, Mike             REP     OH     $147,500       -
   6    Nickles, Donald Lee      REP     OK     $139,298       -
   7    McConnell, Mitch         REP     KY     $136,689       -
   8    Conrad, Gaylord Kent     DEM     ND     $135,392       -
   9    Craig, Larry E           REP     ID     $130,423       -
  10    Breaux, John B           DEM     LA     $128,128       -
  11    Murkowski, Frank H       REP     AK     $122,835       -
  12    Domenici, Pete V         REP     NM     $111,550       -
  13    Brown, Hank              REP     CO     $104,048       -
  14    Bond, Christopher S      REP     MO     $101,036       -
  15    Simpson, Alan K          REP     WY     $100,600       -
  16    Burns, Conrad            REP     MT     $ 99,150       -
  17    Stevens, Ted             REP     AK     $ 90,425       -
  18    Heflin, Howell           DEM     AL     $ 84,000       -
  19    Thomas, Craig            REP     WY     $ 82,013       -
  20    Inhofe, James M          REP     OK     $ 81,800       -
  21    Kempthorne, Dirk         REP     ID     $ 80,000       -
  22    Warner, John William     REP     VA     $ 79,475       -
  23    Lott, C Trent            REP     MS     $ 74,899       -
  24    McCain, John             REP     AZ     $ 74,301       -
  25    Dole, Robert J           REP     KS     $ 71,500       -
  26    Ashcroft, John David     REP     MO     $ 70,998       -
  27    Thompson, Fred Dalton    REP     TN     $ 70,251       -
  28    Santorum, Richard J      REP     PA     $ 69,064       -
  29    Kyl, Jon L               REP     AZ     $ 67,023       -
  30    Hatch, Orrin G           REP     UT     $ 62,800       -
  31    Shelby, Richard Craig    REP     AL     $ 61,198       -
  32    Smith, Robert C          REP     NH     $ 60,650       -
  33    Pressler, Larry          REP     SD     $ 57,625       -
  34    Abraham, Spencer         REP     MI     $ 56,500       -
  35    Specter, Arlen           REP     PA     $ 56,375       -
  36    Cochran, Thad            REP     MS     $ 55,625       -
  37    Hatfield, Mark O         REP     OR     $ 54,850       -
  38    Gorton, Slade            REP     WA     $ 54,499       -
  39    Rockefeller, John D      DEM     WV     $ 53,94O       +
  40    Faircloth, Lauch         REP     NC     $ 53,900       -
  41    Robb, Charles            DEM     VA     $ 53,500       +
  42    Bennett, Robert          REP     UT     $ 52,748       -
  43    Hollings, Ernest         DEM     SC     $ 52,700       -
  44   *Campbell, Ben Nighthorse REP     CO     $ 50,588       -
  45    Grams, Rodney            REP     MN     $ 50,050       -
  46    Ford, Wendell H          DEM     KY     $ 49,891       -
  47    Snowe, Olympia J         REP     ME     $ 49,000       +
  48    Lugar, Richard G         REP     IN     $ 48,999       -
  49    Bingaman, Jeff           DEM     NM     $ 46,500       +
  50    Roth, William            REP     DE     $ 45,350       +
  51    Glenn, John H            DEM     OH     $ 45,092       +
  52    D'Amato, Alfonse M       REP     NY     $ 41,800       -
  53    Lautenberg, Frank R      DEM     NJ     $ 40,200       +
  54    Thurmond, Strom          REP     SC     $ 40,000       -
  55    Coverdell, Paul Douglas  REP     GA     $ 38,072       -
  56    Exon, J James            DEM     NE     $ 36,700       +
  57    Helms, Jesse A           REP     NC     $ 33,500       -
  58    Daschle, Thomas A        DEM     SD     $ 32,183       +
  59    Chafee, John H           REP     RI     $ 30,950       +
  60    Kerrey, J Robert         DEM     NE     $ 30,850       +
  61    Feinstein, Dianne        DEM     CA     $ 30,750       +
  62    Frist, William H         REP     TN     $ 30,000       -
  63    Grassley, Charles E      REP     IA     $ 29,750       -
  64    Packwood, Robert W       REP     OR     $ 29,700       -
  65    Gregg, Judd A            REP     NH     $ 28,600       -
  66    Baucus, Max S            DEM     MT     $ 27,550       +
  67    Bradley, Bill            DEM     NJ     $ 26,030       +
  68    Nunn, Samuel             DEM     GA     $ 25,108       +
  69    Dorgan, Byron L          DEM     ND     $ 22,550       +
  70    Moynihan, Daniel Patrick DEM     NY     $ 22,000       +
  71    Lieberman, Joseph I      DEM     CT     $ 21,500       +
  72    Mikulski, Barbara A      DEM     MD     $ 20,500       +
  73    Bryan, Richard H         DEM     NV     $ 19,000       +
  74    Graham, Bob              DEM     FL     $ 18,600       +
  75    Pryor, David Hampton     DEM     AR     $ 15,400       +
  76    Reid, Harry M            DEM     NV     $ 14,350       +
  77    Bumpers, Dale L          DEM     AR     $ 12,600       +
  78    Kassebaum, Nancy Landon  REP     KS     $ 10,500       +
  79    Inouye, Daniel K         DEM     HI     $ 10,100       -
  80    Cohen, William           REP     ME     $  9,500       +
  81    Levin, Carl              DEM     MI     $  7,500       +
  82    Harkin, Tom              DEM     IA     $  6,100       +
  83    Jeffords, James M        REP     VT     $  6,000       +
  84    Moseley-Braun, Carol     DEM     IL     $  6,000       +
  85    Dodd, Christopher J      DEM     CT     $  5,750       +
  86    Akaka, Daniel Kahikina   DEM     HI     $  5,500       -
  87    Byrd, Robert Carlyle     DEM     WV     $  3,100       +
  88    Biden, Joseph R Jr       DEM     DE     $  3,000       +
  89    Murray, Patty            DEM     WA     $  2,500       +
  90    Boxer, Barbara           DEM     CA     $  2,025       +
  91    Pell, Claiborne          DEM     RI     $  2,000       +
  92    Sarbanes, Paul S         DEM     MD     $  2,000       +
  93    Simon, Paul              DEM     IL     $  1,500       +
  94    Mack, Brent Scott        REP     FL     $      0       -
  95    Feingold, Russell D      DEM     WI     $      0       +
  96    Kennedy, Edward M        DEM     MA     $      0       +
  97    Kerry, John F            DEM     MA     $      0       +
  98    Kohl, Herb               DEM     WI     $      0       +
  99    Leahy, Patrick Joseph    DEM     VT     $      0       +
 100    Wellstone, Paul David    DEM     MN     $      0       +

        TOTAL                                 $5,171,745

+ represents the pro-environmental vote (anti-drilling)
- represents the anti-environmental vote (pro-drilling)

Campbell voted against drilling in the Budget Committee, September 20, 1995
HOUSE AND SENATE CAMPAIGN EXPENDITURES FROM 54 PACS THAT ARE MEMBERS OF THE AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE AND CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT OIL PRODUCERS:
JANUARY 1989-JUNE 1995

Rank    Political Action Committee                              Total Amount
  1     Union Pacific Fund For Effective Government             $1,997,361
  2     Chevron Employees Political Action Committee            $1,111,651
  3     Fluor Corporation Public Affairs Committee (fluor Pac)  $1,084,835
  4     Exxon Corporation Political Action Committee (expac)    $1,079,687
  5     Coastal Corp. Employee Action Fund                      $  922,765
  6     Atlantic Richfield Company, Arco Pac                    $  912,844
  7     Fmc Corporation Good Government Program                 $  900,423
  8     Amoco Political Action Committee (amoco Pac)            $  827,553
  9     Allied-Signal Political Action Committee                $  688,322
 10     Mobil Corporation Political Action Committee            $  647,370
 11     Texaco Political Involvement Committee                  $  595,239
 12     Phillips Petroleum Company Political Action Committee   $  594,355
 13     Ashland Inc Political Action Committee For Employees    $  559,923
 14     Shell Oil Co. Employees' Political Awareness Committee  $  427,250
 15     Union Oil (unocal) Political Awareness Fund             $  393,437
 16     BP America Pac                                          $  366,195
 17     Sun Company Inc Political Action Committee              $  353,300
 18     Panhandle Eastern Corp Political Action Committee       $  331,978
 19     Dow Chemical Co. Employees' Political Action Committee  $  288,050
 20     Dresser Industries Political Action Committee (dipac)   $  287,265
 21     Babcock & Wilcox Company Good Government Fund           $  261,425
 22     Marathon Oil Co. Employees Political Action Committee   $  248,990
 23     Dow Chemical Co.-headquarters Unit Employees Pac        $  224,300
 24     Santa Fe Pacific Corporation Political Action Committee $  220,200
 25     CF Industries Employees' Good Government Fund           $  209,457
 26     Rhone-poulenc Inc Political Action Committee (rpac)     $  207,900
 27     Jeg Good Government Committee                           $  187,557
 28     LTV Steel Active Citizenship Campaign                   $  176,630
 29     Kerr-Mcgee Corporation Political Action Committee       $  160,450
 30     Pennzoil Political Action Committee                     $  147,720
 31     Lorillard Public Affairs Committee                      $  139,854
 32     Crowley Maritime Federal Political Action Committee     $  138,918
 33     Nalco Chemical Company Political Action Committee       $  125,000
 34     Louisiana Land And Exploration Co. PAC                  $  118,215
 35     Better Government Fund Of Mcdermott Incorporated        $  117,350
 36     Independent Association Of America Wildcatters Fund     $  108,515
 37     Fina Inc & Fina Oil And Chemical Company PAC            $   57,000
 38     Kirby Corporation Political Action Committee            $   49,938
 39     Hunt Oil Company Political Action Committee             $   47,938
 40     Maritrans Inc Political Action Committee Maritrans Pac  $   34,199
 41     Ethyl Corporation Political Action Committee            $   32,600
 42     Mitchell Energy & Development Corp PAC                  $   30,450
 43     Gatx Corporation Good Government Program                $   27,000
 44     Foster Wheeler Corporation Political Action Committee   $   23,500
 45     Employees Of Mustang Fuel Corporation PAC               $   22,717
 46     Baker Hughes Incorporated Political Action Committee    $   22,700
 47     Independent Oil Producers' Agency PAC                   $   20,650
 48     Murphy Oil USA Political Action Committee (murpac)      $   15,000
 49     Goulds Pumps Inc Employee Political Action Committee    $    7,400
 50     Continental Emsco Company Active Citizenship Campaign   $    6,400
 51     Conoco Inc Employees' Good Government Fund              $    5,000
 52     Panhandle Eastern Corporation PAC                       $    4,625
 53     Stockham Valves And Fittings Political Action Committee $    4,475
 54     Quaker State Political Participation Fund               $    2,044

        TOTAL                                                  $17,575,920

A study released today shows that U.S. Senators who have supported drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge have received four times more contributions from pro-drilling political action committees (PACs) than those Senators who oppose it. Forty-five of the top 50 PAC recipients in the Senate have voted to open the refuge to oil drilling. This study was prepared by the Environmental Working Group and endorsed by U.S. Public Research Group (U.S. PIRG), Public Citizen, Sierra Club and the Northern Alaska Environmental Center.

"We're outraged that our precious national heritage will be destroyed while campaign coffers grow fat," said Anna Aurilio, Staff Scientist for the U.S. PIRG. "Pro-drilling industries should not be allowed to decide the fate of one of our last great wilderness areas," she added.

Since 1989, the year of the Exxon Valdez oil spill, 54 pro-drilling PACs, including many multinational oil companies, have contributed $17.5 million to Congressional campaigns: current Senators have received over $5 million. The 54 PACs included in this study are members of the American Petroleum Institute and the California Independent Oil Producers, groups that have actively advocated drilling on the Arctic Refuge. This study does not include the substantial amount of money contributed by individuals and "soft money" from oil and gas interests funneled through the national and state political parties.

This week, the Senate will vote on the federal budget reconciliation bill which, if enacted, will allow oil drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The refuge has been protected since 1960 and survived previous efforts to open it to drilling. "The oil industry already has access to over 90% of our Arctic coastline, now they're coming after the last 10% which was specifically set aside as a refuge for wilderness and wildlife," said Sylvia Ward, Executive Director of the Northern Alaska Environmental Center.

"Congress should listen to the American people, not to industry lobbyists and PAC contributors. Poll after poll shows the American people want the Arctic Refuge protected for future generations -- not sold off to the oil industry," said Melanie Griffin, Director of the Land Protection Program for the Sierra Club.

"Instead of spoiling a wildlife refuge, Congress should drill the oil field under Detroit by making new cars and light trucks more efficient. Raising fuel economy standards would save far more oil than Arctic Refuge drilling would yield," said Bill Magavern, Director of Public Citizen's Critical Mass Energy Project.

The Arctic Refuge in Alaska's northeast corner, often referred to as "America's Serengeti," is the only place in the United States where the full range of sub-Arctic and Arctic ecosystems are protected in one unbroken continuum. The coastal plain of the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge is the most important land denning area for Beafort Sea polar bears, a significant nesting and feeding area for millions of migratory sea birds, song birds and waterfowl from six continents, and the ancient calving ground for the 152,000 member Porcupine River caribou herd. Every year, since the retreat of the glaciers, this awe-inspiring herd has traveled some 800 miles to give birth and raise their calves on the Arctic Refuge coastal plain. The caribou are critical to the Gwich'in Indian people whose culture and way of life have been intimately bound to the caribou for 20,000 years.

Biologists predict significant impacts on populations of caribou, muskoxen, polar bears, brown bears, wolves, wolverines, and numerous species of migratory birds if oil and gas drilling on the coastal plain goes forward.


List of WWW sites regarding the Artic National Wildlife Refuge:

Originally Forwarded From * naec@igc.apc.org

Provided by:
* Benton Kealii Pang
Botany Department * University of Hawai`i at Manoa

"If you plan for a year, plant kalo,
if you plan for ten years, plant koa,
if you plan for a hundred years,
teach the children...Aloha `Aina"
P. Burgess


Return to The People's Paths

Return to The People's Home Page